The City of Fontana received a $625,000 state grant which will be used to address the housing crisis, beginning with downtown Fontana.  Pictured above is the intersection of Sierra Avenue and Arrow Boulevard in the downtown area.

Because Carlos Rodriguez grew up in Fontana, he has a sense of pride in this city, and this pride was bolstered by the news that Fontana is receiving a state grant to help alleviate the housing crisis.

Rodriguez, who is now the CEO of the Building Industry Association (BIA) Southern California Baldy View Chapter, was one of the speakers during a press conference which celebrated a $625,000 Housing and Community Development grant.

Rodriguez and the other speakers at the Sept. 24 event said the grant is a step in the right direction as cities throughout California try to come up with ways to address the lack of affordable housing, which has contributed to a rise in homelessness. He noted that San Bernardino County is short about 70,000 housing units.

"The good news is that as we work together to address this crisis, there is a potential of seven new jobs for every new home that we build, and an estimated economic impact countywide of $2 billion if we address the housing shortage in San Bernardino County," Rodriguez said.

Mayor Acquanetta Warren said the "affordability challenges are massive, but they can be taken care of" because the city has a "whatever it takes, we're willing to do" attitude.

"We are going to use this grant to address the housing crisis, beginning with downtown Fontana. The City of Fontana is a working-class community that understands the importance of providing housing options for all working-family budgets," Warren said.

Last year, California Gov. Gavin Newsom declared that 1.3 million new housing units need to be built in Southern California during the next decade.

Fontana is making the necessary preparations by updating its zoning and development code, expediting the local planning permit process, and preparing a comprehensive environmental document that will eliminate project-specific environmental reviews, the city said. These actions will assist in creating a process faster and more efficient for developers to invest and revitalize the downtown area, the city said.

The Sierra Avenue corridor in downtown Fontana is an opportunity zone designated by the U.S. Department of Treasury, and through independent investors and developers, has the opportunity to spur economic development and revitalize the area.

New Legacy Development is currently planning a huge downtown project which will include a five-story residential building on the northwest corner of Arrow Boulevard and Nuevo Avenue.

"We are much looking forward to what the future has in store for downtown Fontana. We have multiple projects in the works now and more to come," said New Legacy Development President Jose Carcelen.

(1) comment


This city officials have no shame, they're proud to announce that they will be using $650,000 to "address the housing crisis in Fontana" so they're not going to be using that money for anything beneficial to the community. I can address the housing crisis for free, all these new warehouses that are being developed in the south end of the city has left a lot of families and businesses misplaced. Use the grant for some thing that will benefit low income families in the city, create jobs for the homeless, even if it means having them clean the parks, or something that will motivate them and they'll see they can make decent income and help them out of their depression,. Wasting the money addressing something we already know, means the city is going to need funds for any developments. I understand most of the cost would be covered by the investors, the city also expends money, it is quite evident that the city council are well involved with the investors, and they never paid for reparations to businesses when they dugged the sewer lines 2 years ago, they acted as if they were doing it for the community when in reality they were doing it for all the warehouses that began being developed a year after, mean while a lot of business lost money during the 4-6month construction time. Someone needs to take a closer look at what's going on and why does it takes $650,000 to address something they already did in this article.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.