I recently introduced Assembly Bill AB) 485 to provide increased public transparency of warehouse development projects funded using taxpayer dollars.

Warehouse developments have grown tremendously in the Inland Empire. As of 2018, Riverside and San Bernardino counties had more than 65,000 individuals working in warehouse jobs.

While the building of warehouses can be seen as a great job creator and tax revenue generator, the data collected over time from warehouse projects paints a different picture about the long-term benefits these developments have on a community. These jobs often come with difficult working conditions, poor benefits, and are at risk of ultimately becoming automated.

Cities strive to compete with one another for new warehouses using tax incentives and economic development subsidies to entice companies to build multiple stadium-sized warehouses. Companies like Amazon benefit from these bidding wars and often choose to build in the city that provides them the best deal. However, the taxpayer-funded subsidies, and other benefits, offered and provided by cities and counties to these companies are not made available to the public.

It just takes a short drive down the 215 Freeway to see firsthand how warehouse developments have changed the landscape of the Inland Empire. This is in large part due to the subsidies provided by local government. Yet, research is showing that warehouses aren't truly benefiting the communities in which they are built.

If cities are going to spend millions in taxpayer dollars to bring these jobs to their communities, at the very least there should be some assurances that workers will be paid a living wage and have adequate safety protections.

Government needs to be smart when using our limited funds. AB 485 will increase transparency so that decisions made improve the lives of the public. It's common-sense legislation that's good for workers, taxpayers, and our communities.

(Assemblymember Jose Medina (D-Riverside) represents the 61st District.)

(2) comments

NathanDavidson

It is pretty strange that there would even be a need for taxpayers to raise such a concern. Shouldn't they be informed of where their taxes are actually being channelled to in the first place regardless of the nature of the facility developments?

PaulChau

It's expected for such industries not to have the best of working conditions - many people do not exactly picture working in a storage industry as a career. Storage prices in Perth South have been improving though and that shows that there is a changing perception to what is going on in the warehousing and logistics industries. Hopefully that will mean that there is a change in the horizon to improve the conditions for all of the people involved in this sort of a business..

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.